bWise Forums: "penny-pincher" All-etf Portfolio - bWise Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

"penny-pincher" All-etf Portfolio Low cost portfolio is a no brainer

#1 User is offline   sschullo 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,746
  • Joined: 09-March 03

Posted 05 February 2009 - 06:44 PM


http://seekingalpha.com/article/118801-the...l-etf-portfolio
0

#2 User is offline   BenefitsGeek 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 22-December 06

Post icon  Posted 07 February 2009 - 09:40 AM

FYI, ETFs are generally not available in 403(b) plans, as they do not qualify as a a permissible investment under Code Section 403(b) (i.e., they are not 403(b)(1) annuities or 403(b)(7) cutodial accounts/mutual funds)
0

#3 User is offline   sschullo 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,746
  • Joined: 09-March 03

Posted 07 February 2009 - 09:59 AM

Hi geek,
Right on!
I keep forgetting that most people are working and not eligible for 403b to an IRA rollover to purchase ETFs.
I was using this link as an example of a low cost portfolio using Vanguard. You might add that most teachers do not have Vanguard as a direct choice but cannot transfer money to VG either! Many thanks the new regs that "threw out the baby with the bath."

However, if a working teacher is over 59.5, they can execute a 403b to an IRA rollover and transfer money to Vanguard or any vendor not in their plan.
Thanks for the clarification,
Steve
0

#4 User is offline   bigred 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 51
  • Joined: 02-December 08

Posted 07 February 2009 - 10:43 AM

QUOTE(sschullo @ Feb 7 2009, 08:59 AM) View Post

Hi geek,
Right on!
I keep forgetting that most people are working and not eligible for 403b to an IRA rollover to purchase ETFs.
I was using this link as an example of a low cost portfolio using Vanguard. You might add that most teachers do not have Vanguard as a direct choice but cannot transfer money to VG either! Many thanks the new regs that "threw out the baby with the bath."

However, if a working teacher is over 59.5, they can execute a 403b to an IRA rollover and transfer money to Vanguard or any vendor not in their plan.
Thanks for the clarification,
Steve


What about a district where the plan doc does not allow for the transfer out of funds until you create a separation of service, per the TPA's attorney?
0

#5 User is offline   sschullo 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,746
  • Joined: 09-March 03

Posted 07 February 2009 - 11:25 AM

Hi big,
The financial consultant to our 457b oversight committee said that any person over 59.5 can roll over their 403b into a rollover IRA and transfer to any vendor.
I cannot answer your specific question but I am quite sure somebody else more knowledgable will answer your question.
Steve


0

#6 User is offline   Vince 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 30-January 07

Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:06 PM

QUOTE(BenefitsGeek @ Feb 7 2009, 06:40 AM) View Post
FYI, ETFs are generally not available in 403(b) plans, as they do not qualify as a a permissible investment under Code Section 403(b) (i.e., they are not 403(b)(1) annuities or 403(b)(7) cutodial accounts/mutual funds)
I do recall seeing an IRS publication that allowed inclusion of ETS or CEFs, I was skeptical, which is why I distinctly remember that experience. Let me see if I can dig it up.
0

#7 User is offline   Vince 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 30-January 07

Posted 10 February 2009 - 04:47 PM

§ 851:

(a) General rule

For purposes of this subtitle, the term "regulated investment company" means any domestic corporation—
(1) which, at all times during the taxable year—
(A) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 to 80b–2) as a management company or unit investment trust, or

403(7)
(7) Custodial accounts for regulated investment company stock
(A) Amounts paid treated as contributions
For purposes of this title, amounts paid by an employer described in paragraph (1)(A) to a custodial account which satisfies the requirements of section 401 (f)(2) shall be treated as amounts contributed by him for an annuity contract for his employee if—
(i) the amounts are to be invested in regulated investment company stock to be held in that custodial account,
...

© Regulated investment company
For purposes of this paragraph, the term "regulated investment company" means a domestic corporation which is a regulated investment company within the meaning of section 851 (a).


BenefitsGeek- would you interpret this as allowing ETFs within a 403b7, as long as it is held in a custodial account designed for this purpose?


0

#8 User is offline   intruder 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,275
  • Joined: 19-August 07

Posted 10 February 2009 - 07:35 PM

QUOTE(Vince @ Feb 10 2009, 04:47 PM) View Post

§ 851:

(a) General rule

For purposes of this subtitle, the term "regulated investment company" means any domestic corporation—
(1) which, at all times during the taxable year—
(A) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 to 80b–2) as a management company or unit investment trust, or

403(7)
(7) Custodial accounts for regulated investment company stock
(A) Amounts paid treated as contributions
For purposes of this title, amounts paid by an employer described in paragraph (1)(A) to a custodial account which satisfies the requirements of section 401 (f)(2) shall be treated as amounts contributed by him for an annuity contract for his employee if—
(i) the amounts are to be invested in regulated investment company stock to be held in that custodial account,
...

© Regulated investment company
For purposes of this paragraph, the term "regulated investment company" means a domestic corporation which is a regulated investment company within the meaning of section 851 (a).


BenefitsGeek- would you interpret this as allowing ETFs within a 403b7, as long as it is held in a custodial account designed for this purpose?


Only if the the ETF is regulated as a mutual fund under IRC 851. I thought ETFs were traded on a stock exchange not a mutual fund.

0

#9 User is offline   elgordo42 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 73
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 10 February 2009 - 08:24 PM

Most ETFs have an equivalent mutual fund as their base, I know that is true for the Vanguard funds in the article. So you can buy essentially the same product in whichever form you need. As an ETF through a brokerage IRA, for example, or as a mutual fund through your 403b(7) account.

One difference is that the ETF expense ratio is usually a bit lower, since the fund company does not need to service an individual account for each ETF buyer.


0

#10 User is offline   Vince 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 266
  • Joined: 30-January 07

Posted 11 February 2009 - 12:36 PM

QUOTE(intruder @ Feb 10 2009, 04:35 PM) View Post
QUOTE(Vince @ Feb 10 2009, 04:47 PM) View Post

§ 851:

(a) General rule

For purposes of this subtitle, the term "regulated investment company" means any domestic corporation—
(1) which, at all times during the taxable year—
(A) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 to 80b–2) as a management company or unit investment trust, or

403(7)
(7) Custodial accounts for regulated investment company stock
(A) Amounts paid treated as contributions
For purposes of this title, amounts paid by an employer described in paragraph (1)(A) to a custodial account which satisfies the requirements of section 401 (f)(2) shall be treated as amounts contributed by him for an annuity contract for his employee if—
(i) the amounts are to be invested in regulated investment company stock to be held in that custodial account,
...

© Regulated investment company
For purposes of this paragraph, the term "regulated investment company" means a domestic corporation which is a regulated investment company within the meaning of section 851 (a).


BenefitsGeek- would you interpret this as allowing ETFs within a 403b7, as long as it is held in a custodial account designed for this purpose?


Only if the the ETF is regulated as a mutual fund under IRC 851. I thought ETFs were traded on a stock exchange not a mutual fund.
Some ETFs fall under the category of UITs, which fall under the definition of a regulated investment company. This would allow inclusion in 403b7. I would imagine it would not be easy to administrate such an arrangement, but it is definitely a legal and viable option, albeit rare.
0

#11 User is offline   BenefitsGeek 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 22-December 06

Post icon  Posted 14 February 2009 - 09:48 AM

Yes, the ETFs that are common in the marketplace are generally NOT 403(b)(7) custodial accounts.

QUOTE(Vince @ Feb 11 2009, 12:36 PM) View Post

QUOTE(intruder @ Feb 10 2009, 04:35 PM) View Post
QUOTE(Vince @ Feb 10 2009, 04:47 PM) View Post

§ 851:

(a) General rule

For purposes of this subtitle, the term "regulated investment company" means any domestic corporation—
(1) which, at all times during the taxable year—
(A) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 to 80b–2) as a management company or unit investment trust, or

403(7)
(7) Custodial accounts for regulated investment company stock
(A) Amounts paid treated as contributions
For purposes of this title, amounts paid by an employer described in paragraph (1)(A) to a custodial account which satisfies the requirements of section 401 (f)(2) shall be treated as amounts contributed by him for an annuity contract for his employee if—
(i) the amounts are to be invested in regulated investment company stock to be held in that custodial account,
...

© Regulated investment company
For purposes of this paragraph, the term "regulated investment company" means a domestic corporation which is a regulated investment company within the meaning of section 851 (a).


BenefitsGeek- would you interpret this as allowing ETFs within a 403b7, as long as it is held in a custodial account designed for this purpose?


Only if the the ETF is regulated as a mutual fund under IRC 851. I thought ETFs were traded on a stock exchange not a mutual fund.
Some ETFs fall under the category of UITs, which fall under the definition of a regulated investment company. This would allow inclusion in 403b7. I would imagine it would not be easy to administrate such an arrangement, but it is definitely a legal and viable option, albeit rare.


0

#12 User is offline   intruder 

  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,275
  • Joined: 19-August 07

Posted 14 February 2009 - 11:53 AM

Who knows of any fund families that offer ETFs in a 403(b)(7)? TIAA-CREF, VG, Fidelity?
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic